The AMD 750 chipset for PC100-SDRAM was blessed with a long life. Now, almost two years later, AMD launches the AMD 760 as a successor to their processors with DDR-SDRAM support to enter the race.
AMD launches three new Athlon versions at the same time in order to enable users to utilize the full bandwidth of the AMD 760 and the faster memory clock: the new Athlons offer a clock speed of 1000, 1133, and 1200 MHz and an FSB clock of 266 MHz instead of 200 MHz.
The fact that the DDR-SDRAM really facilitates a considerable boost in performance was already proven by the VIA Apollo Pro266 for Intel processors, which tecChannel.de tested - the english review is here. The expectations to be fulfilled by AMD's 760-DDR chipset therefore are just as high. Due to the increase in the processors' FSB clock speed, the Athlon should - at least in theory - be able to utilize the DDR-SDRAM even better than the Pentium III.
tecChannel.de tested one of the first mainboards with the AMD 760 chipset as well as a 1.2 GHz Athlon with the FSB clocked at 266 MHz.
The AMD 760 chipset in detail
The AMD 760 is AMD's first socket/slot A chipset with DDR-SDRAM support. The successor of the AMD 750 is again equally suitable for both Athlon and Duron processors.
The chipset consists of two components: the North Bridge AMD 761 comprises the AGP, PCI and memory controllers in addition to the CPU interface. The new South Bridge is called AMD 766. Key innovations include the two UltraDMA/100-compliant EIDE interfaces and four USB ports. In addition, two serial ports, one parallel port and the floppy controller are integrated here.
Equipped with DDR-SDRAM, the AMD 760 can handle clock speeds of both 200 and 266 MHz. PC100/133 SDRAM is no longer supported. The chipset is able to manage a maximum of 4 GB RAM. Four DIMM slots are available.
The FSB of the AMD 760 may also be clocked at 266 MHz in addition to the usual 200 MHz (DDR). Whether or not the chipset only supports the synchronous operation of memory and processor (at a clock speed of 200 MHz or 266 MHz for FSB and memory bus) or whether various combinations may be used, was not confirmed by AMD Germany when interviewed by tecChannel.de.
However, AMD did not integrate sound and modem features in the 760 chipset according to the AC/MC97 standard. These features have long since become standard with chip manufacturers such as Intel and VIA.
In addition to AMD, ALi and VIA have already announced DDR chipsets for Athlon/Duron processors. However, no test mainboards with these chipsets have been available so far.
Chipset | AMD AMD-760 | ALi ALiMAGiK 1 | VIA Apollo KT266 |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
North Bridge | AMD-761 | M1651 | to be announced |
Slot / Socket | Slot A / Socket A | Slot A / Socket A | Slot A / Socket A |
FSB-Clock (MHz) | 200/266 DDR | 200/266 DDR | 200/266 DDR |
Memory Clock (MHz) | 200/266 DDR | 66/100/133 SDR and 200/266 DDR | 66/100/133 SDR and 200/266 DDR |
Max. Memory (MByte) | 4096 | 3072 | 4096 |
Memory Type | DDR-SDRAM | SDRAM, DDR-SDRAM | SDRAM, VC-SDRAM, DDR-SDRAM |
AGP | 4x | 4x | 4x |
South Bridge | AMD-766 | ALi M1535D+ | VIA VT8233 |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
UDMA100 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
USB-Ports | 4 | 6 | 6 |
AC97 Audio/Modem | No | Yes | Yes |
Legacy I/O | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Keyboard Controller | Yes | Yes | Yes |
New Athlon processors
AMD is launching a few new Athlon processor versions to go with the AMD 760 chipset. However, their innovative character is limited to an increase in the FSB clock from 200 MHz to 266 MHz. The core has not undergone any changes. The processors we are referring to are the Athlon 1000 and the Athlon 1200, which are now offered at a bus clock speed of 266 MHz by AMD. Notwithstanding, their offering continues to include versions with an FSB clocked at 200 MHz. Another new product is the Athlon 1133 with a bus clock of 266 MHz. The Athlon 1100 with an FSB clock of 200 MHz, which has been around for some time, also continues to be included in AMD's product portfolio.
The 266 MHz Athlons will not be assigned an official addition to their designations. Very much like the variants offering an FSB clock of 200 MHz, they continue to be marketed under the Athlon brand. The identification of the individual variants is based on the OPN (Ordering Part Number), which is printed on the processor die (see figure). The Athlon CPUs with 200 MHz FSB are allocated numbers that end on the letter "B", the numbers of the 266-MHz versions end on the letter "C".
According to information provided by AMD, the Athlon processors with an FSB clock speed of 266 MHz FSB are scheduled for volume shipping as of 30 October 2000. The following table provides an overview of all current Athlon processors. The prices relate to shipping volumes of 1,000 units.
MHz | FSB clock (MHz) | Price (US Dollars) |
|---|---|---|
State as of 30 Oct. 2000 | ||
1200 | 266 | 673 |
1200 | 200 | 612 |
1133 | 266 | 506 |
1100 | 200 | 460 |
1000 | 266 | 385 |
1000 | 200 | 350 |
950 | 200 | 282 |
900 | 200 | 215 |
850 | 200 | 193 |
Further DDR chipsets
DDR chipsets are available for both AMD Athlon/Duron and Pentium-III systems. VIA, AMD, ALi, and Micron are either waiting in the wings with their products or have announced them already. The DDR technology offers the advantage that the chipsets support both SDR-DRAM and DDR-SDRAM. So PC133 and PC266 will no longer require special chipsets. The MTH bypass is thus eliminated.
ALi
The first mainboards equipped with ALi DDR chipsets are scheduled to come off the conveyor belt by the end of 2000. ALi offers the ALiMAGiK 1 for AMD's Athlon/Duron processors, Intel CPUs can resort to the Aladdin Pro 5. Both chipsets support up to 3 GB in terms of main memory: the options include EDO, PC100/133-SDRAM and PC200/266-DDR-SDRAM. The M1535D+ South Bridge is used in both chipsets. It comprises six USB ports, UltraDMA/100 support and integrated sound/modem features.
AMD
At the beginning of 2001, AMD is going to present the multi-processor version of the AMD 760. The chipset dubbed AMD 760MP supports SMP for two Athlon/Duron processors. The AMD 762 North Bridge of the multi-processor chipset supports PC266-DDR-SDRAM of up to 4 GB. The memory may consist of up to four registered DIMMs. AGP4X, UltraDMA/100, and 32-bit as well as 64-bit PCI busses with 33 or 66 MHz are also on the feature list. The AMD 760MP supports the MOESI cache protocol of the Athlon processors. This will not only ensure that both processors always read current data and/or keep them in the cache - the chipset also uses its cache handling scheme to cut down on memory access and to enhance system performance in this way.
Micron
At the Microprocessor Forum 2000, memory manufacturer Micron Semiconductor presented their Mamba, a PC chipset with Athlon interface and embedded DRAM. The 8 MB memory serves as L3 cache. However, Micron has so far been rather hesitant to provide further on the Athlon chipset Mamba. DDR-SDRAM support, AGP4X and a 64-bit PCI-X interface is all we've known up to now. Micron also maintains a stony silence on the availability of the chipset.
VIA
In addition to the Apollo Pro266 for Intel processors, which was already tested by tecChannel.de, the Apollo KT266 for Athlon/Duron processors is scheduled for launch this year. Both chipsets support up to 4 GB PC200/266 DDR-SDRAM. PC66/100/133 memory and VCM are further options. The list of features also includes UltraDMA/100, six USB ports as well as integrated audio, modem and network features. Both chipsets use the same VT8233 South Bridge. Contrary to the Apollo Pro266 for Intel CPUs, the Apollo KT266 does not offer multi-processing capabilities.
Advantages offered by DDR-SDRAM
AMD committed themselves to DDR-SDRAM at an early point in time. In TeamDDR, AMD supports the DDR-SDRAM technology as the memory technology of the future in cooperation with VIA, ALi, NVidia, Infineon, Hyundai, and many other companies. The group's target is to make DDR-SDRAM a widespread technology available at a low price as quickly as possible. Even Intel has recognized the potential of DDR and are turning their back on the Rambus memory slowly but surely. Intel's first DDR chipsets are scheduled for mid-2001, though yet unconfirmed.
As compared to Rambus memory, DDR-SDRAM offers a major advantage: it is an evolutionary technology based on standard SDRAM and - to put it in simple terms - only uses the two clock pulse edges for data transmission. PC133-SDRAM runs on the memory bus at a clock speed of 133 MHz. This rate is maintained for the PC266 DDR-SDRAM. The use of both clock pulse edges may - wrongly - cause users to expect a clock speed of 266 MHz.
Although the timing of a DDR memory bus is more sensitive than with an SDR bus, the path layout of a mainboard does not have to be re-designed completely. Mainboards based on 4-layer technology will continue to be sufficient. This is a major advantage for the mainboard manufacturers since existing production lines only have to be adapted to a minor extent, and the plants will continue to be able to produce new boards at low cost. Thus, the integration of PC266 in existing mainboard layouts is relatively simple.
The same applies to memory modules: DDR-SDRAM uses DIMM boards with the same dimensions as with the SDRAM technology. However, the number of pins has risen from 168 to 184. The new pins are required for additional control signals. DDR-DIMMs, moreover, feature different notches in order to avoid the incorrect mounting in PC100/133 slots. The reference designs and specifications for DDR-SDRAM modules are available for free use from AMI and JEDEC.
The Rambus memory did not enjoy the advantage of an evolutionary development. And this is the key problem of Rambus. RDRAM works with a data capacity of only 16 bits and a very high frequency in order to achieve equivalent data transmission rates. This requires completely new mainboard and memory module designs. The propagation delay of signals at frequencies of 800 MHz (both clock pulse edges) is extremely critical. That is why only a few manufacturers come to grips with the production of RIMM boards since maximum precision is required to do so.
Detailed information on DDR-SDRAM technology
The core technology of DDR-SDRAM is based on the typical SDRAM and uses four independent memory banks internally. During data transmission, the propagation delay is critical for both edges of the clock signal. DDR-SDRAM does therefore not only use the normal system clock for synchronization but also an additional bi-directional DQS strobe signal. The signal that travels in parallel to the data serves both chipset and memory as a reference for the validity of the data on the bus. DQS offers the basic benefit of making high-speed data transfer feasible. This is ensured by way of reducing access times. The strobe signal, moreover, renders a slight deviation of the bus clock between chipset and memory unproblematic.
In order to facilitate identical timing for the DQS strobe signal and the data, the physical parameters of the wires used must be identical in terms of length, impedance and capacity. Any changes in the transmission parameters caused by temperature or voltage fluctuations equally affect both DQS and the data. This ensures that there will be no timing problems between chipset and memory during a data transfer. This additional check renders a stable high-speed operation more reliable than synchronization by means of the global system clock.
If a read command is issued, the DDR-SDRAM generates and controls the bi-directional strobe signal and indicates the valid data to the chipset by means of the rising and falling clock pulse edges. It's the reverse with a write command. Here the chipset generates and controls the strobe signal, using the two clock pulse edges to signal the validity of the data to be read to the memory.
Decreased power consumption
Mainboards for PC266 require an additional voltage stabilizer for the memory. As opposed to the SDRAM's 3.3 V, DDR memory relies on a supply voltage of only 2.5 V. DDR thus follows the general tendency towards lower operating voltages and - as a consequence - a decrease in power consumption.
In addition to the reduction in supply voltage, DDR-SDRAM technology features a decrease of the capacity of DRAM cells of 20 percent. These two changes ideally reduce the power consumption of the PC266 memory to half of the power consumption recorded for PC133-SDRAM. DDR-SDRAM therefore constitutes a highly interesting memory technology in particular for notebooks since it extends battery life.
Type | SDRAM | DDR-SDRAM | RDRAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Voltage | 3,3 V | 2,5 V | 2,5 V |
DRAM Core | Parallel Interface | Parallel Interface | Protocol |
I/O Interface | LVTTL | SSTL | Rambus |
Banks | 4 | 4 | 16 |
Organization of Bits | x4/x8/x16 | x4/x8/x16 | x16/x18 |
IC packaging | 54-Pin TSOP | 66-Pin TSOP | 74-Pin CSP |
While it is true that RDRAMs also offer a low supply voltage of 2.5 V, Intel nevertheless abandoned their Rambus plans for mobile chipsets at an early stage. The notebook chipset developed by Intel under the code name of Greendale has never been used due to technical problems. Apart from thermal issues, the high frequencies used with RDRAM also caused problems. Due to the high degree of packaging density, interference with adjacent components was unacceptable. And to top it all, RDRAM memory is rather costly.
Introductory remarks on the benchmarks used
What hardware configuration do you use for benchmarking a brand-new chipset and memory technology? By the way, the board tested is a Corona demo model provided by AMD. The series models the mainboard manufacturers are going to ship in the future may be expected to offer slightly increased performance.
The results obtained in a comparison with the PC133 SDRAM with the rest of the set-up remaining unchanged, are of particular importance. We opted for the KT reference board VIA VT5276D supplied by VIA, which offers very good performance.
Unfortunately, the AMD Corona did not run at an FSB clock speed of 100 MHz while the VIA VT5276D failed right away at 133 MHz. That is why we still owe you a comparison at an identical FSB clock speed.
The graphics board we've used so far, i. e. a Guillemot Maxi Gamer Xentor 32 with NVIDIA's TNT2 Ultra, is still fast enough for 2D applications. The Athlon 1200-266, however, ventures into performance categories in which this graphics board would slow down 3D games. In addition, we therefore used a Creative Labs GeForce2 GTS with 32 MB DDR-SGRAM for games. This means that you cannot compare the 3D results any longer to our previous benchmarks. The table lists the percentage performance increase recorded for all the tests we conducted. Please refer to the ensuing pages for the exact values of the key benchmarks.
Benchmark | DDR266 vs. PC133 with Athlon 1200 (266/200 MHz FSB), increase in percent | Athlon 1200 vs. 1100 at 200 MHz FSB and PC133, increase in percent |
|---|---|---|
| ||
Windows NT 4.0 SYSmark 98 | 3,0 | 6,4 |
Windows 98 SE SYSmark 98 | 3,5 | 2,9 |
Windows 98 SE SYSmark2000 | 3,5 | 5,2 |
3Dmark 99 Max 800x600x16 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
3Dmark 99 Max CPU 800x600x16 | 8,5 | 4,9 |
3Dmark 99 Max 1024x768x16 | -0,9 | 0,0 |
3Dmark 99 Max CPU 1024x768x16 | 7,0 | 4,6 |
3Dmark2000 1024x768x16 | 1,3 | 0,6 |
Expendable 640x480x16 | 4,1 | 1,4 |
Expendable 800x600x32 | 0,3 | 0,0 |
Expendable 1024x768x16 | 0,2 | 0,0 |
Unreal Hardware 800x600x16 | 3,6 | 1,1 |
Unreal Software 800x600x16 | 12,8 | 4,9 |
Quake 3 640x480x16 | 5,0 | 2,5 |
Benchmark | DDR266 vs. PC133 with Athlon 1200 (266/200 MHz FSB), increase in percent | Athlon 1200 vs. 1100 at 200 MHz FSB und PC133, increase in percent |
|---|---|---|
| ||
Geforce2 GTS | ||
Expendable 640x480x16 | 17,3 | 3,6 |
Expendable 800x600x32 | 18,0 | 3,2 |
Expendable 1024x768x16 | 17,8 | 3,2 |
Expendable 1024x768x32 | 11,4 | 2,6 |
UT 1024x768x16 | 10,6 | 3,7 |
UT 1024x768x32 | 10,4 | 3,3 |
Quake 3 800x600x32 High, Demo1 | 13,2 | 2,5 |
Quake 3 1024x768x16 High, Demo1 | 11,4 | 2,2 |
Quake 3 1024x768x32 High, Demo1 | 4,3 | 0,3 |
Quake 3 640x480 Normal, Demo2 | 18,7 | 3,1 |
3Dmark 99 Max 800x600x16 | 13,0 | 3,1 |
3Dmark 99 Max CPU 800x600x16 | 8,2 | 4,8 |
3Dmark 99 Max 1024x768x16 | 12,3 | 4,2 |
3Dmark 99 Max CPU 1024x768x16 | 8,2 | 4,1 |
3Dmark2000 1024x768x16 | 3,5 | 1,7 |
Memory performance
You expect a processor with twice as much memory bandwidth (at least theoretically) to come up with a considerable increase in performance? In real life, however, this is not quite the case. CPU manufacturers, on the one hand, have already uncoupled their CPUs from RAM with their L1 and L2 caches. Branch prediction algorithms and parallel execution of instructions also make sure that the system will have to wait for the slow main memory to catch up as seldom as possible. And even if the system is in for a wait, this is done block-wise with the system reading ahead in order to predict the further execution of the program.
Apart from the FSB and memory clock speeds, maximum memory performance also depends on the CPU performance. The table shows that the Athlon 1200-200 is not able to outperform the Athlon 1100-200 with PC133-SDRAM. So the PC133 memory does not allow any further increase in the transfer rate.
In comparison, the increased FSB clock and the fast DDR-SDRAM permit the Athlon 1200-266 to step up the data transmission rate considerably. Talking about doubling the transmission rate would, however, be somewhat farfetched.
All values were determined on the basis of our tecMEM benchmark and a 128-MB memory module. tecMEM, though producing valid results on all our platforms, is still under development and currently not available for the public, please bear with us.
Athlon 1200-266, DDR266 | Athlon 1200-200, PC133 | Athlon 1100-200, PC133 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
Chipset | AMD-760 | VIA KT133 | VIA KT133 |
Write (MByte/s) | 456,9 | 344,9 | 345,3 |
Read (MByte/s) | 364,3 | 336,3 | 336,1 |
Average R/W (MByte/s) | 410,6 | 340,6 | 340,7 |
Move (MByte/s) | 290,8 | 221,9 | 230,6 |
2D benchmarks: Windows 98
The performance under standard applications is key for the productive day-to-day use of the chipset. These applications do not only include programs such as Word and Excel but also an MPEG encoder, 3D software, video software and sound software. We tested the capacity of the mainboard with the benchmark package SYSMark98, which is a combination of the aforementioned programs. The more recent SYSMark2000 version uses additional and updated software.
Please note: All benchmarks were carried out at the FSB clock speeds specified for the individual processors, i. e. 133 MHz (266 MHz with DDR) for the Athlon 1200-266. The other processors ran at 100 MHz (200 MHz). The graphics board used was a Guillemot Maxi Gamer Xentor 32 with NVIDIA TNT2 Ultra, which is certainly not overtaxed by 2D applications.
2D benchmarks: Windows NT
Corporations continue to rely on Windows NT as their favorite operating system. The tests we conducted under Windows NT 4.0 show that the 3.0 percent margin of DDR memory as compared to the PC133 SDRAM is slightly narrower than under Windows 98 (3.5 percent).
Please note: All benchmarks were carried out at the FSB clock speeds specified for the individual processors, i. e. 133 MHz (266 MHz with DDR) for the Athlon 1200-266. The other processors ran at 100 MHz (200 MHz). The graphics board used was a Guillemot Maxi Gamer Xentor 32 with NVIDIA TNT2 Ultra, which is certainly not overtaxed by 2D applications.
3D benchmarks: 3DMark
3D performance is among other things tested on the basis of the 3DMark99 Max Pro and 3DMark2000 benchmarks by MadOnion.com. Due to their comprehensive 3D tests, the benchmarks provide insight into the performance of the chipsets when these are used for sophisticated 3D applications. Among others, the AGP and the memory buses were exposed to severe loads.
Of course, the final score obtained with 3DMark99 Max Pro and 3DMark2000 also strongly depends on the graphics board. However, since we always use the same extension, any factors that might lead to distorted results are excluded.
Please note: All benchmarks were carried out at the FSB clock speeds specified for the individual processors, i. e. 133 MHz (266 MHz with DDR) for the Athlon 1200-266. The other processors ran at 100 MHz (200 MHz). The graphics board used was a Creative Labs GeForce2 GTS with 32 MB DDR-SGRAM.
3D games: Expendable
Expendable is a genuine Direct3D game. It offers complex light effects and textures. It is in particular high resolutions and color depth that put a special strain on the hardware.
Please note: All benchmarks were carried out at the FSB clock speeds specified for the individual processors, i. e. 133 MHz (266 MHz with DDR) for the Athlon 1200-266. The other processors ran at 100 MHz (200 MHz). The graphics board used was a Creative Labs GeForce2 GTS with 32 MB DDR-SGRAM.
3D games: Quake III Arena
The 3D game Quake III Arena V1.17 retail version uses OpenGL. We tested the "high" setting with sound and Demo 1. The test range is completed by a test conducted with the "normal" setting and Demo2.
Fire at will:
Please note: All benchmarks were carried out at the FSB clock speeds specified for the individual processors, i. e. 133 MHz (266 MHz with DDR) for the Athlon 1200-266. The other processors ran at 100 MHz (200 MHz). The graphics board used was a Creative Labs GeForce2 GTS with 32 MB DDR-SGRAM.
3D games: Unreal Tournament
Unreal Tournament, the retail version with patch 420, is particularly suited as a 3D benchmark. The game comes up with many effects and puts a particular strain on the CPU. The game demands a high memory bandwidth from the graphics board and system memories. It supports Direct3D, OpenGL as well as GLide and Metal (S3). We tested Unreal Tournament under Direct3D.
Please note: All benchmarks were carried out at the FSB clock speeds specified for the individual processors, i. e. 133 MHz (266 MHz with DDR) for the Athlon 1200-266. The other processors ran at 100 MHz (200 MHz). The graphics board used was a Creative Labs GeForce2 GTS with 32 MB DDR-SGRAM.
Conclusion
Benchmark tests produce figures that can be used in a simple and unbiased manner for a comparison to the values obtained with other configurations. According to the results, the combination of Athlon 1200-266 and DDR266-SDRAM for use with 2D applications outperforms other systems by a maximum of 3.5 percent. If these figures are compared to those obtained for the Pentium III with DDR266-SDRAM, a 6.3 percent increase is recorded for the 2D benchmarks.
Due to the increase in its FSB clock, the Athlon actually should clearly outperform the Pentium III, which has to manage with an FSB clocked at 133 MHz in all configurations. From this point of view, the Athlon with DDR memory is a big disappointment. This may be to due to AMD's demo board, which has not been optimized perfectly so far. However, the Pentium III still used a demo board supplied by VIA, which means that the basis of the test was comparable for both.
A pleasing result, however, is the performance increase the combination of Athlon and DDR-SDRAM shows with 3D games. Almost 20 percent higher frame rates live up to the expectations here, if a fast graphics board is used. Even with the software rendering of Unreal Tournament, which is more or less independent of the graphics board, DDR-SDRAM and the new Athlon with a FSB clock speed of 266 MHz was 12,8 percent faster than with PC133 memory.
AMD continues to consolidate their technological lead. However, it remains to be seen whether or not the Athlon will manage to use this increased performance to withstand the enhanced Pentium 4 with an FSB clock rate of 400 MHz and core speeds beyond 1,5 GHz. (mec)
(Translation by Isolde Gassner. This story is (c) 2000 by IDG Interactive GmbH. All rights reserved.)
Test Setup
Component | Details |
|---|---|
| |
Mainboard 1 | AMD Corona |
Serial No.. | --- |
Firmware | Evaluation |
Noteworthy | Socket A |
Mainboard 2 | VIA VT5276D |
Serial No. | --- |
Firmware | Evaluation |
Noteworthy | Socket A |
RAM 1 | CP |
Serial No. | 9E4591 171C 0157 |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | 128 MByte SDRAM PC133 CL=2 |
RAM 2 | Centon Electronics 128MB PC100 CL=2 |
Serial No. | 118426 |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | PC100 / SEC KM48S8030BT-GH |
RAM 3 | Micron PC2100 128 MByte CL=2,5 |
Serial No. | Evaluation |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | PC266 / MT46V8M8-75 |
Soundcard | TerraTec XLerate Pro |
Serial No. | 1293900011399 |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | Rev. C / 4.06.2016 / 13.03.1999 |
NIC | 3Com Fast Etherlink 3C905B-TX |
Serial No. | 6TQ2E9F5E9 |
Firmware | Hardware-Ver.: 048 |
Noteworthy | Rev. A / 4.10.2222 / 05.05.1999 |
Graphics Board 1 | Guillemot MaxiGamer Xentor 32 |
Serial No. | 905381151072 |
Firmware | V2.05.13 |
Noteworthy | Detonator 5.16 |
Graphics Board 2 | Creative Labs GeForce2 GTS |
Serial No. | TGB0010020050818 |
Firmware | V2.15.03.01.07 |
Noteworthy | Detonator 6.31 |
SCSI Card 1 | Adaptec AHA-2940U2W |
Serial No. | BF0A8110E48 |
Firmware | V.2.01.0 |
Noteworthy | Rev. A |
SCSI Card 2 | Adaptec AHA-2940UW Pro |
Serial No. | BC0B90904KF |
Firmware | V.2.11.0 |
Noteworthy | Treiber v2.21A |
Hard Drive | Quantum ATLAS IV 9 WLS |
Serial No. | 369919430210 |
Firmware | 0808 |
Noteworthy | 8,7 GB REV 01-D |
DVD-ROM | Pioneer DVD-303S-A |
Serial No. | TGT0059424WL |
Firmware | 1.09 |
Noteworthy | --- |
PSU | Channel Well Technology ATX-230 |
Serial No. | 540299070594 |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | 230 W |
Keyboard | Cherry RS 6000 M |
Serial No. | G 0064322 4 L28 3 I |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | --- |
Mouse | Logitech M-S35 |
Serial No. | LZA84352020 |
Firmware | --- |
Noteworthy | 3 Keys :) |